AdvertisementThe Strategic Capabilities Office is under new management, and its new director intends to doubledown on the agency’s emphasis on artificial intelligence.
In his first interview since taking over the office, Chris Shank, the new SCO director, made it clear he sees artificial intelligence as a sweet spot for his office.
Roughly one third of SCO projects deal with autonomous systems, machine learning or AI in some way, Shank said, including long-range fires programs, cyber programs and some assorted with special forces.
Shank is the the group’s second leader, following Will Roper, the office’s founder who is now the Air Force’s top civilian acquisitions official. But don’t expect major changes in how the office works.
“My job is to keep momentum going,” Shank explained. “It’s a very high ops tempo group that [Roper was] able to recruit and attract into the office, in terms of working synergistic teams around that. What I am trying to do is take it from a startup organization to a long-term sustainable one.”
Although they share some DNA, the SCO’s mission is different from that of the Pentagon’s technology office, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Where the latter is focused on finding and prototyping the game-changing technologies for future battles, the SCO is trying to understand existing needs and address them in new ways.
Getting those projects from tests to prototype to a tool used by the services remains a central challenge, Shank acknowledged, but he said that is one of the office’s core function.
The Strategic Capabilities Office JARVIS project will use robots, similar to those depicted, to conduct autonomous precision drilling, as part of the Palladium program, aimed at conducting smarter sustainment. (SCO)
The Strategic Capabilities Office's JARVIS program for the Navy involves machines scanning man-made aircraft parts and then re-producing them more quickly and efficiently. (SC)
“Where SCO lives is the valley of death,” Shank said, referencing a term for when technologies infamously tend to fail.
The SCO had been reporting directly to the Secretary of Defense, but under the Pentagon’s recent reorganization, it now reports to Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering Mike Griffin.
Shank acknowledged the importance of coordination within that office, particularly with AI, which now has a number of different centers of gravity within the Pentagon – a $2 billion push by DARPA, an AI center under Chief Technical Officer Dana Deasy, a directorate under the R&E enterprise, as well as various service-level initiatives.
The R&E enterprise has weekly meetings to deconflict investments in AI, Shank said, emphasizing the different business models and goals between the groups.
Shank described two programs — each named after pieces of the Iron Man movie mythos — as examples of how SCO can use AI to assist the services in the near-term. Paladium is a broader Navy logistics effort, which involves “smart sustainment” in support of fourth-generation fighter aircraft. A sub project for that is JARVIS, which involves putting a robotics suite out into the field with maintainers that can scan existing parts and quickly re-manufacture them.
Shank said the office identified two parts that would require around 2,000 man hours to build out; JARVIS should be able to quickly recreate those, saving both time and the potential errors that come from human-machined pieces.
Perhaps those projects aren’t as shiny as some of SCO’s other programs, such as the Perdix drone-swam, but finding areas where AI can be injected onto existing system and where “the human brain doesn’t have to work” as hard will have benefits across the Pentagon, Shank said.
The office is primarily focused on the Indo-PACOM and European Command theaters, Shank said. However, he expects to soon provide an update on the Sea Mob/Ghost Fleet initiative, which involves converting existing naval vessels into unmanned systems. He also indicated that there would be unmanned projects in air and land that are unveiled in 2019.
One looming cloud for the office: an attempt earlier this year by members of the House Armed Services Committee to kill the SCO by 2020. However, when asked if he was concerned about that proposal, Shank flatly said “no.” He traveled to the Hill shortly after taking office to address that specific issue. In describing the conversation with lawmakers, Shank said, “’I know this wasn’t your intent, but this impacted both morale and my ability to recruit talent into the organization,’” he said, “and they [said] ‘that wasn’t our intent.’”
The SCO is working on a report for Congress on the future of the organization.